-
Website
http://dannybrown.me/ -
Original page
http://dannybrown.me/2008/11/27/social-media-is-a-language-of-its-own/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Sasha H. Muradali
17 comments · 18 points
-
GlobalPatriot
11 comments · 5 points
-
Ari Herzog
85 comments · 23 points
-
gacconsultants
20 comments · 1 points
-
Danny Brown
594 comments · 28 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
How to Sell Social Media – Twitter
3 weeks ago · 7 comments
-
Never Mind the P, Just Get the Relations Part Right
4 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Gratitude is Simply Attitude
4 weeks ago · 5 comments
-
How to Sell Social Media – Twitter
Most of my friends and family look at me like I'm from Mars when I talk about the stuff I do online - as you say, I'm using a different language.
Now I will definitely be more aware of just letting people know the information that might be of interest vs. how I found it or who told me.
<abbr>Lynn Crymble´s last blog post..Where's the Love for Canadian Internet Users?</abbr>
Nope. Not at all, actually.
I recently gave a presentation to a bunch of people at a conference that was basically "social media tools 101" and the part that apparently surprised most of the audience was the part where I said "not every tool is right for every person or business - just because the 'early adopters' are all raving about it doesn't mean you'll ever want or need to use it. Let your message determine the medium."
This, apparently, is rocket science.
Then again, maybe not - because you just said the exact same thing in a different format.
Would it be much easier for your husband to copy & paste a link in email to you? It would be if he wants you to actually read the frickin' thing. ;) But if he wants to build a community with other Stumble Upon users and use it to drive traffic? Well, that won't happen with email.
Is Twitter incredibly worthwhile for most people? Um... no. And this is coming from someone who is a bit more than a Twitter addict. The *average* twitter user follows less than 10 people and is followed by less than 10 people. The only reason they use it instead of email or text messaging? Because it's faster than email, shorter (so it doesn't have to be all formal) and not interrupting the other person like a text. (The other guy decides when he reads it, if he reads it.) For someone in Social Media or Marketing or PR or (well I could go on) it's a different world... and yeah, kind of important.
But it's like bars to me. Some people like dance clubs, some the neighborhood bar, some pool halls, and others wine bars (again, I could go on) but we all find our niches and what works for us and that's where you'll find us.
Thanks to your husband, I can now find you over at one of your two blogs. And don't worry about the pictures thing - post them only if you want to! :)
<abbr>Lucretia Pruitt´s last blog post..Even a Chatterbox like Me Listens…</abbr>
Personally, I believe that the wide array of tools has cost a lot of blog entrepreneurs from achieving their true potential. As they flood the social media sites trying to promote themselves, you get the type of backlash they had on Digg. And my slant on services like Twitter is they're a fantastic way to follow the big players like Scoble et al, but finding a platform for yourself is much harder.
<abbr>Gerard´s last blog post..Self-employed me, week three</abbr>
I do agree with what Lucretia says about the community building aspect of social media. Social media tools help to create a one-to-many relationship as opposed to a one on one. That kind of communication is not necessary for everyone, but there is value in it for many people.
At the end of the day, it's definitely not essential that people use or even know what these tools are about. They do have their place, but it's up to each individual what they use and how they use it.
Thanks for sharing your perspective, I look forward to you taking over Danny's blog more often! :-)
<abbr>Susan Murphy´s last blog post..On Thankfulness</abbr>
You have taught us a lesson with your post. Thanks !
You have brought about a new challenge to social media protagonists to bridge that gap between the evident and the not so evident.
Now..lets turn around and witness how social media giants start to influence you through a social media platform. :)
Having said that, I hope to see you in "Twitter" one day....soon ! :-)
<abbr>Tara´s last blog post..Watching Culture Evolve: A New Cultural Creative Study To Be Released Soon</abbr>
@ Gerard. I'd both agree and disagree with you. Certainly the amount of social media tools, sites and networks available can lead to people either mistaking their use or abusing them. In the Digg situation (and similar sites like Stumbleupon), it's quite clear that constant self-promotion is not looked upon kindly - the closing or suspending of accounts is the natural result. But yes, too much time on social media does definitely take away the ability to build quality content.
I'd probably disagree about Twitter - I've found some great "lesser" people on there, as well as been found - many new readers and subscribers to this blog have come from there, via recommendations by these people and Chris Brogan, funnily enough. If you join the conversation (even with the "superstars") you can find the return surprising.
@ Susan. I think Jacki may have found some new social media friends on here! :) As you say, we can live in a bubble and we don't realize it because we're too used to everyone else sharing the same perspective. It's nice to have this kind of reminder now and again that there are other worlds apart from the social media one.
Thanks for stopping by and sharing your views, and maybe I'll let Jacki post on here again sometime, Suze... ;-)
@ Tara. I think this is the problem, and one that Jacki highlighted really well. The web DOES change so fast and already we're seeing so many tools fall by the wayside. I've mentioned it before in a previous post, but perhaps when social media finally settles and has justa few standard toolsets to use, more people will "get it". Until then, it's probably the early adopters that will use it and the rest of the world will happily carry on regardless. ;-)
Thanks for reading and sharing your views, guys appreciate it.
But here is my point. I know that these things work when used appropriately. Everyone knows my husband. If you haven't heard of Danny Brown, then you are not reading this. BUT as socially awesome as he is, he never has to leave the house.
What is this world coming to, when my husband, Mr. Social Butterfly, has more pairs of pajamas then jeans?
And someone recently invited me to get LinkedIn - ahem... DELETE
lol
I'm glad you follow my rants and blogs, it makes them worth it. You'll probably see me on Twitter soon. I'll eventually crack and want to figure out what it means to be "tweeted" but it will be a long time from now. I probably received 30 Facebook requests before i caved and joined. But I'm very basic on Facebook. No need for groups or albums or applications... no patience, no time.
<abbr>Jacki Brown´s last blog post..I smell a rant</abbr>
Bear in mind that I'm exceptionally sceptical of the snake-oil sold on ProBlogger-type sites, because very few of them are open enough these days to show stats or back up their claims of how much traffic things like Twitter bring them!
<abbr>Gerard´s last blog post..Should I SEO my website?</abbr>
Great great time reading your post, I'm so glad I did!
People don't know what they don't know! It seems obvious but it's not.
This sort of writting you post here, just makes me sure about things I wrote on my last post ( marketingeasy (dot) net - George Clooney post)
Goodonya!
Luio
<abbr>lucio´s last blog post..George Clooney is web2.0, Danny Devito is 1</abbr>
<abbr>Jacki Brown´s last blog post..I smell a rant</abbr>
The comments so far definitely show that while social media can be great both personally and professionally, it doesn't need to be for everyone. But even if someone doesn't use it, they can still instill a nice discussion between proponents and non-users.
Good to see.