-
Website
http://dannybrown.me/ -
Original page
http://dannybrown.me/2009/08/25/is-twitter-killing-blog-comments/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Sasha H. Muradali
17 comments · 18 points
-
GlobalPatriot
11 comments · 6 points
-
Ari Herzog
85 comments · 23 points
-
gacconsultants
20 comments · 1 points
-
Danny Brown
594 comments · 32 points
-
-
Popular Threads
I really like the thoughtful, over 140-character limit, response that comes from a blog comment. The conversation doesn't become stale (if you replied later on Twitter, the thought might already been gone or an 'old' tweet) and it can continue to everyone who wants to listen/read on that very blog post.
I don't think there's anything wrong with tweeting about blog posts, but it's limited. It seems more about promotion and tid-bits. I do like to step away for a moment actually read blogs and comment directly. However, it is a more direct approach that isn't as universal. As @JonBishop said, the Disqus "tweet this" functionality is great because you can incorporate both and ask others to join in.
Twitter is fantastic for conversations - as I mentioned in the post, look at #journchat or #blogchat for great examples. But unless you're using a dedicated hashtag, often many comments or convos can be missed by a few people.
Now, if Lijit, Disqus and BackType can work together to create the ultimate all-in-one blog search and comment aggregator... ;-)
I recently had a great experience when I tweeted a blog post that I really enjoyed. The author replied, encouraging me (in a very nice and non-spammy way) to share my comments on the post. I may have commented anyway, but this showed me that the author was interested in engaging. A very nice and continuing conversation ensued. So, I think the Twitter and blog conversation can be synthesized well.
As a new blogger, I hope that I can model this approach.
@knmu
And welcome to the wonderful world of blogging - I'll pop over and visit you shortly, Kim. :)
My site is still definitely a work-in-progress. I'm just trying to learn as much as I can.
It's a solution that's almost begging to be met - perhaps a way to connect to your networks via your email, with your choice being set up prior to even commenting? Similar to how some systems (like Posterous, for example) let you post a blog on multi-networks, maybe comments can do the same (if selected).
Of course, then it'd be down to the individual not to just add more noise. Ah, brainteasers - don't you just love 'em? ;-)
I fully agree that the conversations that occur on blogs via the comments can take the value of the post to a new level (for the reader, the blogger, and future readers). So yes, by all means lets encourage those comments. The blogger can assume some responsibility, the community can assume some responsibility (after all, sometimes its just that one comment that gets the conversation rolling). But don't begrudge the tweets anymore than you do the discussion I with my husband the other night about one of your past brilliant posts :)
I know what you're saying and where you're coming from, and I agree with your view - but I'm not quite sure if it's the same thing? Definitely, the conversation will expand beyond the original post, much like water cooler conversations in offices.
But say the blogger isn't connected to where the conversation is taking place, or doesn't follow the people who are chatting away from the content. Without the feedback that in-house comments can often give, can the blogger truly continue to grow his or her voice?
I don't begrudge tweets and external conversations at all (had some great ones on the Facebook walls!) - I'm just wondering if the external can eventually dilute the internal?
Great views, as usual :)
I do not think the killing is the appropriate verb rather dispersing blog comments. Most people that are commenting for example today on this blog have likely tweeted your article and in that case a broader audience is activated to fully engage on this topic.
I like the way this post was written. It lends itself in many ways to prove a point: Twitter has not killed your commenters. However, I tend to favor Twitter and its limitations b/c writing efficaciously in 140 characters demonstrates powerful communications.
This is a tough one to answer definitively...
I'd say, that if someone actually reads my post, and they have something to contribue, they'll comment on my blog.
The conversations on twitter are usually:
1) In response to the tweet about the post (which means they didn't read it)
or
2) in response to someone on twitter bringing up a point from the post (which also probably means they didn't read it)
Sometimes, I get someone who reads my whole post and then replies via twitter, but that's not common. If they do that, I usually encourage them to elaborate in a comment.
Personally, twitter has helped me get more comments. I pull out really interesting points that my readers bring up in comments, and tweet it out with a link to their comment.
I use twitter to pull more into the conversation.
Also, when others see people talking about the post and discussing on twitter, that drives more people to the post (if there are links) to comment.
I see what you're saying, but in general, I'd actually say twitter has helped get more comments, rather than hurt the conversation on my blog.
Interested to hear others' experiences.
@DavidSpinks
I'm wondering if better integration between Twitter and blogs is an option? Backtype, Disqus and others are trying for sure, but so far it's not really working ideally - they either have to be trackbacks or on the conversation. And that can often clutter the comments more, and out people off.
I wouldn't want it automated because:
1) I reply to most of the comments I get, so it might get spammy on twitter if they're all being posted.
2) going from #1, not all comments are worthy of pointing out in a tweet
3) my comment replies aren't formatted well for twitter. On twitter I phrase it differently to draw people to the conversation
The problem with pulling twitter comments into your blog is, well, retweets. A lot of people will be sharing your post, and that's different from what we'd consider a "comment". They're more like a trackback, but not nearly as significant currently.
I liked how BackType had their settings with BackType connect. They use an algorithm that shows whether it's a simple RT or actually adding to the conversation, then you decide whether you have that within the flow of the comments, or as a backtrack solution.
Of course, then you take away the value of the "real" backtracks from other bloggers, and can then dilute their potential new audience.
Le sigh... ;-)
So, yes - Twitter might be killing comments, but I think the enablers have a big part in it.
I see a lot of people scrambling to pull Twitter/Facebook/etc "remarks" back into their comment streams with Chat Catcher and the like. That behavior serves only to pump up the comment count at the cost of the blog-centric discussion.
From what I've seen, most of the "remarks" on Twitter are from scanners who wouldn't normally leave a comment anyhow.
If people want to have a conversation about your post on Twitter, I say have it there!
Also, consider asking only one question at the end of your post. Answering all four is quite a bit to chew on and would require a lot of time. Ask me one? You'll probably get a comment. Ask me four? I'll probably hit the RT button and say "great post." As it is, I ignored most of your questions and left a meandering comment that immediately confuses participation with contribution!
Speaking of which, I love that Twitter has allowed all the "great post!" people a place to leave their 3-word comments.
=)
I hear you on the Twitter and social media reactions/interactions - it's one of the reasons I quite like the Disqus option (and the BackType one with my previous comments system). At least you can have separate from the main comments area - some plugins do take up valuable real estate with nothing more than a simple retweet.
Here's a question - if people were talking about your blog post just on Twitter and not in your comments, would that "bother" you?
They're still talking about my post, just on Twitter? Very cool.
I would love to have some input on how I might make this happen faster ? Or is it REALLY important to do this?
It just seems a shame when real thought-provoking posts appear to be less popular than lists that you can find on hundreds of other blogs.
Personally, when I come across a blog post I like or find interesting I'll typically retweet it and maybe give a short why you should read this link explanation and use the comments section to give my own two cents or add any uber insightful thoughts :)
I'd agree that tweets are just too short to give too much of an opinion on a blog. By posting it in the comments, although the opinion in the comments may have a smaller reach than your 15,000 twitter followers, it will have an audience that is way more interested and informed on the topic you're talking about. Also, comments always make the blogger excited!
In sum. Hooray for comments!
Here's the thing, though - as you say, blog comments may not get the same eyeballs as your thousands of Twitter followers (that may or may not be active users anyhoo). But just say you could encourage your Twitter connections to check out more blogs - imagine the organic community and discussions that could grow from there?
I think there's a great opportunity for a company to really go to town on comment systems and socnet integration - we just haven't seen that yet.
However, where I get confused is that sometimes the posts I write that get the most traffic and most retweets have very few comments. Example: My post from today has been tweeted 30 times but only has 5 comments. I don't understand - if it's so "popular" that everyone wants to share it on Twitter, then why doesn't anyone comment on it? *sigh*
I had been using ChatCatcher for a while but I felt like that just cluttered up my comments area, so I disabled it. I want the comments to focus on real reaction and discussion.
I try to pose questions in a lot of my posts to encourage people to leave feedback and share their views, but I am still finding it hard to consistently generate comments and discussion.
It seems like many people like to tweet and run - and yes, I think that's killing blog comments.
But what I do dislike is when sharing in and of itself becomes a substitute for interaction. I'd rather have more people challenge me, add to my post, share a contrasting view, etc. via a comment (no matter where the comment is left) than simply push my content out into the Twittersphere or elsewhere without adding their own take somehow.
Hmm... so maybe I *should* get rid of the Tweetmeme button? :-)
Your response then diverts back to where that comment cam from - keeping the conversation going while not asking anyone to be somewhere they might not want to be at that time.
Heck, I'd pay for a system like that!
I think it is a story of borrowing from Peter in order to pay Paul, meaning that the conversation is moving from the blog itself to Twitter - and this is something that has definitely happened to my posts.
As a blogger, I would very much like to see the conversation on my site.
On the flip side, if the true goal is to stimulate conversation, does it matter on what medium the conversation takes place?
With the Twittersphere discussing your topic, your post will have impacted many more people in different networks, enhancing the conversation greatly.
Now, if we can find a way to have both the far-reaching quick-hits and the well-constructed comments section, that would be quite awesome.
For now, I'm OK with promoting discussion on topics, wherever the discussion takes itself.
As I mentioned to Jackie a couple of comments up, if a company lik Disqus, BackType or J-Query can truly integrate all "proper" discussions (as opposed to just simple retweets) from Twitter, Facebook and similar, and place them in real-time settings as they happen, that could truly open up a whole new worls for everyone.
I was reading about that GigaOM test, and it did look interesting. I'm just curious whether that would "add" to the commentary, or just have another way of having extra backlinks or reactions at the end of the post?
I looked at JS-kit's Echo comments system, and while it has potential, it currently offers a lot of noise. Posts that look like they have 300 comments, to find that there are about 20 genuine discussions coupled with 270 RT's... gah!
Blogging is evolving so much, with platforms like Posterous and Tumblr making it easier than ever before, it'd be great to see something that can involve all your converations, in real-time.
I think Friendfeed could have offered an idea on how to achieve that (particularly with BackType of Disqus integration) - but now that they're part of Facebook... who knows where that'll go.
Is the solution to this to bring your twitter feed closer to your blog, to have a widget searching for your @name to display the conversation on your blog as well as on twitter, I don't know.
I don't necessarily think that Twitter is killing comments, though; they're just coming in a different format. If you've got people who have clearly read what you've written, but who've chosen to have a more immediate exchange with folks on Twitter, what's wrong with that?
So, I'm gonna have to say that ... I agree, for the most part, with the good Mr. Simonds.
I hear both you, Seth (and others) re. the value of Twitter for bloggers. Yet as I mention to Valerie above, I wonder how many bloggers may decide blogging's not for them if they gauge "success" by community interaction? There might be a fantastic conversation happening around their post - but if they're unaware of it, they may become disillusioned and quit? Which would be a huge shame.
And I'm all about colorful sayings. :)
Twitter and even Facebook (which I've actually seen better blog post conversations happen) has created digital touch-points for bloggers to connect with readers and help build upon that community and engage them. Would you want all comments to be on your blog? Sure. But we have to be willing to understand that these platforms feed upon our hyper-connectivity and provides us opportunities to converse within other forms of media.
In the end, our homebase (blog) is where people will remember us and feel a part of - if they feel so inclined. As much as we don't want to admit it, many of these platforms won't exist in X years - but our blog, where we strive to build a thriving community, will always be there, comments and all - so long we pay our hosting service ;)
It is up to the blogger, I agree - yet I've seen some of the most community-minded bloggers around struggle to encourage visitors to leave comments on some of the most thought-provoking posts. It's this that makes me wonder if the bite-sized conversations taking place elsewhere can have a detrimental effect on a blog and its author?
There's no doubting Twitter, Facebook and other mediums are great conversation points, but unless the blogger knows about them, he or she may think they didn't connect. Perhaps they may even give up because of it (I had a couple emails to this effect over the weekend) - and that would be a real shame.
Now if only we could integrate all conversations seemlessly... ;-)
Definitely tough to tackle but we've all just gotta keep busting our ass and staying on the grind to make our blog worthwhile to the community we've built. :)
I'm just not sold on that as a platform - the noise looks absolutely crazy and without testing it, I'm not sure how much flexibility there is. That would probably put me off commenting - kinda non-conducive to my post here ;-)
I'm just curious as to whether the ease of soundbites sometimes negates the option of discussion, much like TV dinners had an impact on family dinners at the dining table.
Life is change. I'm especially glad of that on hot summer days when I don't have to wear several layers of long skirts. ;)
Perhaps the number of blog posts being broadcast and retweeted on Twitter is also watering down the number of comments; you can't comment on them all.
Yes some folks do just chat about a blog post topic on Twitter, but those who do comment on the post, often have very useful information to share, some folks are simply trying to connect with the community and say "good job/thanks."
I find plenty of blogs via Twitter that I would never have found or commented on. But I'd love to see someone develop some stats.
I do find with some clients, I have to teach them things that seem natural to me. A couple of clients recently said -"I got a comment on my blog - cool!" I asked, if it was a valid comment, "well did you reply to them, engage them on the topic?" They both said some version of, "oh I didn't know I should do that, how do I do that." They are very smart people, I have learned that I need to set up this expectation ahead of time now, "when you get a comment, if possible, and if it will add to the convo, reply to it," but it was so obvious a next step to me, I never thought about it.
I think:
-Those who blog are more likely to comment than just interact/talk on Twitter
-Those that have been blogging for longer will comment on other blogs
-I think those seeking to engage with their audience will be more likely to comment
-Those trying to showcase their knowledge (or push their SPAM) will both be more likely to comment
but
-Others who are newer to social media and blogging are less likely to think of that as the next step. My most recent post is on connecting the social media dots, how people can connect their various online "outposts." By the reaction I received, people thought it is a great idea, but many had not really done it.
-Those who are shyer may hesitate to comment on a blog
-Those who are very busy, or ave limited time for social media are less likely to comment on a blog, it does take more time and thought to do well.
Also, I like the interaction of talking about a post via Twitter too. It is harder to track conversations about a post (unless you are on a format twitter chat or use #hashtags well), but that real time exchange can also be a fun and a dynamic learning experience.
I think it is a both personal thing and it may also be a learning continuum. For many, at first it's all talking on Twitter, but once they get the hang of Twitter, and when they find a blog post that moves them, and read interesting comments, they will begin to comment more often.
For me personally, I find the dynamic and serendipitous nature of Twitter to make me far more likely to comment on a blog post, than finding posts in my more more static RSS feeds/feed readers. Although "common wisdom" would say that it is best to comment on a few people's blogs and build a relationship with the blogger. I do that too, but I love Twitter's variety.
Cathy Larkin
Of course, it could then beg the question - do we need to be encouraging comments from Twitter, or leaving as is?
The other reason I like to encourage blog comments, is that it offers a way to deepen the conversation/discussion/exploration of an issue much more than can be done in 140 characters on Twitter. While Twitter allows more people to 'get in' on the discussion in real time.
I don't know if there's a magic formula, or someone would have bottled it by now. Oh, I forget, Chris Brogan already has. LOL.
Seriously, though, I'm a pretty new blogger, as you know, and what I've seen is that the more I share and comment on other posts, the more it draws people to my blog (not rocket science, though I've got to be careful about using that phrase, I've already used it once in a comment today!). I've certainly had my share of people tweeting or RT'ing my posts with very little actual engagement on the blog itself; when I try to figure out why this is, I think it's probably because a) they liked it enough to share but it didn't rouse them sufficiently to actually comment, or b) they liked it well enough but couldn't find anything new to add to the discussion. These are the two reasons I usually don't comment on posts, particularly the latter. I do, however, share them on Twitter, via Google Reader, Facebook and so on.
Would I like more comments on my posts? Of course. Do I want people to stop RT'ing them? Heck, no. As long as my peeps, tweeps, feeps (and so on) care enough to share, at some point they will care enough to write. And that's what I have to keep working towards.
Thanks for a great discussion, Danny.
I'm just wondering if the ease of RT's (and, by essence, the "stature" of the person doing the original RT) makes a difference? You mention Chris Brogan - say he tweets one of your posts. Because he's built the trust factor that he has, he'll immediately get a bunch of RT's without some of the folk actually visiting the post. It's because Chris saw value in it that others believe it must have.
This is great that it's being shared - but does it then dilute the message if it's not clear to others why someone like Chris would have tweeted it in the first place?
Very true about the Brogan factor, but I have to think at least some of those RT's will lead to comments. Chris (and many other power tweeters) often say why they like a post, so that will likely make a difference, don't you think? Or at least prompt people to ask? This is pure guesswork on my part, because I've never been in that position.
It's nice talking to you in more than 140 characters. :) Though I don't know if I'm Woofer-ready... yet.
I think the key difference is that often, the social bookmarks don't encourage discussion like Twitter does. Sure, you will always get some submissions that have great chats going on around them - but more often than not, it's less chat (at least on the submissions I've seen or added to).
The first company to come up with a truly universal (and effective) comment aggregator might just end up owning the space Robyn - we can but hope :)
I still get excited whenever I see a new comment alert - I don't think that ever goes away! :)
I think that's a great point you raise, and one I touched on in a couple of replies earlier. Comments can often be seen as the success of a blogger (either by visitors or by the blogger themselves); and I just wonder if lack of comments (or perceived lack) might eventually deter an audience or blogger, even though the blog may actually be very successful popularity-wise?
I have read that choosing which bloggers to follow should include evaluation of the comment stream -- number of comments, number of different commenters, number of repeat commenters, for example -- as well as blogroll, links, pingbacks, etc. The concept of influential bloggers is still largely hocus-pocus, in my opinion -- volume of Twitter followers is interesting, but only if the followers are in your intended market.
The Calculated Risk blog on economics is widely read and hugely commented, but irrelevant to a Dad-blog audience focused on child rearing. We are still figuring this stuff out...
Cheers.
Twitter if you go back through your history it is there but often you only get one side of the conversation. When you are participating in a blog and/or Facebook you have a landing page. This helps build relationships between the blogger and the community.
I think you can have a mix of both but you need to get lurkers out of the box and if people comment on Twitter maybe you need to get them to stay on your blog? I don't know how you do it but there has to be something different.
It's definitely an area where a blog community can prosper and grow - the trick is in finding out what's the most successful, as you say.
Something else to consider is whether a Twitter user is your ideal blog commenter, considering there are more Facebook users than Twitter users.
Also consider whether you prefer comments or views.
As far as comments or views, I'd prefer the comment route every time - I'm all about the community, Ari. Views are the eyeballs, but comments are the lifeblood.
I was writing long before I ever got my first comment, and if no-one ever commented again, yes, I'd continue - it's my outlet. But some folk may be put off through perceived lack of interest, and that would be a shame if it was due to views versus comments and what's easier to gauge.
I am not sure if Twitter is killing blog comments, so much as it seems to be the easier route to comment. There are a lot of blogs I choose not to comment on, but I'll Tweet about them. I think Twitter and comments can work together and you can utilize both.
Why? Your blog may "look" dead with 2 comments per post, but when someone tweets your article to their audience, it exposes you to new readers, and overall, that's probably better for the health of your blog.
There is one thing that I think Twitter did kill...
...And that's a thoughtful follow-up blog post that expands on someone's article. This was all the hype back in 2006 when you could see sparring via trackback, but that has seemingly died off with the popularization of Twitter.
Personally, I enjoy comments on a blog (here or otherwise) as it offers far more scope for what you're thinking (see Cathy's response further up for a great example).
There are certainly a lot of follow-up posts still doing the rounds, but there does seem to be a dearth of them compared to even just a year back.
So what's the original goal of a post? Is it to get people talking? Or just to get them to leave a comment? Both? To try to create a community? To get people to comment and discuss only on your site? Or does it matter that they're talking elsewhere, or even on their own site, or their microblog? What's the goal?
Seems to me it's just like everything else: you can't control it. And, in reality, when we measure success by the number of RTs or number of comments, we're doing ourselves a great disservice. Many lurkers have not waded into the engagement pool and feel comfortable leaving a comment yet.
Also, when I see a long list of comments, I don't want to read them it all. It actually repeals me from leaving a comment. I don't have that kind of time to read them all. I want to take what I can from your post, share it if I think it's valuable and spread some link love. I want to grow in learning and knowledge, apply it if possible and move on. When it’s relevant, practical and I can apply it easily to my work, that’s when I really get excited.
So is Twitter killing blog comments? IMO, Twitter may actually help spread your message.
I agree - it's not (and shouldn't be) about the numbers, and that wasn't the intent of the post. It's simply asking a question about other networks affecting one of the core strengths of a blog and its community. It's fantastic that discussions happen elsewhere - much like reading groups for books.
Yet wouldn't it be cool if all these discussions interconnected and used the blog as a hub? More people could bounce thoughts off each other and really open up a topic. As it stands, much of the conversation is fragmented, and I think that's what can hurt any medium, blog or otherwise.
I know what you mean about comment numbers, and yet it'd be a shame to miss out on that one nugget of gold that a commenter can leave.
Thanks for some great views.
Check out this post for some additional thoughts: http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/08/30/social-medi...
http://twitter.com/franswaa
js-kit are trying with their new Echo system, but again that seems a lot of noise for no reason. The Smashing Magazine is a good example, with the tabbing option. Here's to the first truly interconnected comments system that makes a sense of everything.
________________________________
I autopost my blog to Facebook and lose comments to that site all the time, but if I didnt post them there, I probably never would have reached that audience.
Honestly at the end of the day, if you create compelling content and ask interesting questions, the comments come... I think this one makes 79 comments on this post alone.
It's one of the things that's come up in the previous comments - it would be really cool if there was one big aggregator for comments, that integrated seamlessly, in real-time, from the various outlets. Them when you replied, it would go back to that person's medium, whether it was Facebook, Friendfeed, Twitter, etc. Soon, maybe? :)
Must admit, with the new functions it's just introduced (including BackType support at last!), Disqus is doing a great job of trying to meet this. If they can work out how to include CommentLuv, we'd be set :)
Personally, I know I comment much less now because of Twitter. It's something I've noticed myself doing less and less of. I had come to the conclusion it was because I chose to discuss it on Twitter instead. I've actually been making an effort to change that.
I think, too, that many times blogs survive because of the great comments left by their readers. The conversations that can get going because of comments on blogs are endless.
As always, appreciate the post, Danny. :)
I'm beginning to sound like a broken record now, but if someone could find a way to seamlessly integrate meaningful comments from different playing fields, and the replies went back to these places, I'd happily pay a monthly premium for that type of functionality. :)
There's a statistic that Darren Rowse has put out there in his two ProBlogger books about how less than 1% of a blog's audience leaves a comment. So I haven't been sold (yet) on Twitter (or FaceFeed) cutting into the amount of comments that would be left.
I guess I look at Twitter as an admittedly cool tool and a great way to build connections, yet someone's blog as the place where real magic can happen. Networks can be fleeting (look at Plurk), but a blog and its community can continue to grow even when the networks have gone. And it's be a shame to see bloggers who could be great potentially giving up, from perceived views that Twitter (or anywhere else) is the hub.
Maybe the next question should be "Is Twitter reducing the topics of blog posts"? ;-)
Upon seeing your blog quote of 'community/connection/conversation', I can't help but agreeing that through blog comments, we can achieve that goal better comparing to microblogging. As much as I adore Twitter, personally I still find it's more like a convenient promotional tool. I can know a blogger better through the written post and one's viewpoint on comments. Call me conservative, but I think Twitter as a supporter for blog instead of taking over. ^^
As of Is Twitter Killing Blog Comments? ~ well, it's quite like the time when people though Twitter is Killing Blogging -- not a chance, if we keep the blog-commenting going.
@wchingya
Social/Blogging Tracker
It's obviously personal choice, and I'd never say one way is "righter" than the other. But, it does offer a wider scope for discussion in the comments area, as opposed to maybe catching the odd refererence in a conversation in a shorter playing field.
I do see what you mean about the potential for the conversation to get fragmented. Yet I am not convinced it is. As an avid reader of books I will naturally take an idea and reference it in a blog post, a conversation with a client, and tweet about it. To me that is a demonstration of an expanding conversation rather than a diluted one. Seems to me the robustness of the conversation on our blogs is more a function of relevance to and relationship with our readers. If it goes other places as well it is a sign we have made an impact even if we have no clue about where it went beyond our blog.
Something I have noticed that may be relevant to this conversation is that as I follow more people I notice I have slipped into a mode of reading a lot more and commenting a lot less. Commenting thoughtfully takes time (I am probably think too much!) and I am reading more and more blogs. Also, I am reading a lot more on my Blackberry and commenting from there is painful! This post is a reminder for me to comment more because the conversation matters on so many levels.
So would you say that perhaps as your reach grows (on various networks as well as your blog), the interactions are less focused and more widespread? So what may appear less interaction in one area is actually completed elsewhere?
If so, there's an immense opportunity for a smart developer to really go to town on social integration. I know some are trying but they're not quite there yet. But if you could collate all conversations seamlessly, in real-time and with success...
I learned this first hand today and you helped. Sitting around on vacation reading blog comments and it struck me they were too agreeable. Wrote about it and presto and all day conversation, more than I had bargained for, took place on my blog. But the fact is none of that could have developed on Twitter with the same depth. It wouldn't all sit in one place as easily accessible. And it wouldn't have added to my own premise nearly as much. But your ideal calls for a few things. One, posts that aren't simply easy to agree with but offer a thought provoking idea that will stimulate conversation. Two, a welcoming blogger who makes people comfortable and accepted for speaking their mind and advancing the conversation. And three, readers who are not only engaged, but who themselves are able to craft an argument, express an opinion and feel comfortable doing so. A blogger can stimulate one and two easily. And that, in fact, will lead to three.
Your three paths should be Blogging 101 (although this can still come down to personal perception of both blogger and reader, I guess). They tie in quite nicely with Valerie Simon's ideas as well, in her recent guest post:
http://dannybrown.me/2009/08/27/why-would-you-b...
I guess at the end of the day, it's almost like the water-cooler at the office, and the social beers at the end of the week. Twitter's like the water-cooler; many of the conversations are snippets to be expanded on. Then comes the end of the week drinks (the blog), and what started out as a snapshot soon expands into something more involved.
Either way, they're both good - and conversation adds to the experience wherever the outpost.
Cheers!
It is also not surprising that my most popular post by far was the post I did about #followfriday. That speaks to the current source of most of my blog readers - Twitter.
My biggest challenge is that a large percentage of my target audience is made up primarily of people who barely know what a blog is. They read my newsletter but very few click through to the blog. If they want to comment or ask a question they send an e-mail. For those who read blogs they are not yet comfortable making a comment for the world to see. People who use twitter and who blog are far more likely to comment. So how to I encourage the people new to social media to actually engage on my blog so the conversation can get richer? That is my bigger concern.
I also notice though that I am commenting less lately. One reason could be that I am just reading a lot more blogs and have not been taking the time to comment. The biggest reason though - I am reading a lot more on my Blackberry and commenting from there is frustratingly tedious!
Great topic Danny
My personal take is that i try to comment on blogs i follow regularly as much as i can. i don't always do a good job of it, but i try. i know bloggers want comments and that taking the time to connect with them on their blog mean a lot. it's important to do.
On the Twitter note ... it drives traffic like no other so if i really enjoy something i'm going to Tweet and Comment - that's the right thing to do. It takes time, but that's the way you can bring the most benefit to the blogger. Hands down.
http://twitter.com/franswaa
I definitely think Twitter is killing blog comments. While I certainly see a fair amount of retweets to our blog posts, I've seen an absolute decline in comments over the past months. Those people I've asked have said it is just easier to ReTweet than it is to put an ounce of effort in some thoughtful comments. While there are certainly people still commenting, I think that people seem to find it easier to share a post, rather than to comment.
As long as they connect somewhere in the ethereal pathways isnt that all that matters?
Have a great day, Danny.
I like the feature of disqus by the way.. Thanks for sharing Very cool...
Tatyana Gann