How does one measure wealth? Who's to say how many more people would have connected with Bill Gates if he would have maintained a blog? How would the economy have been impacted if Bill Gates or Warren Buffett, had the foresight to reach out to you and me via the written word, one-on-one? We'll never know.
Blogs are how we broadcast what is in our minds, our thoughts, our psyche at that particular moment. They are how we get to know our friends, acquaintences, customers. There is no more powerful tool, in my opinion.
Thanks for a great post and the opportunity to share.
Caleb Gardner
· 11 months ago
Danny: This is a great point, and one that many businesses forget when they want to jump on the social media bandwagon. Blogging is just one of the many tools of the trade, but it seems to get more publicity than the rest.
Joe Boughner
· 11 months ago
Danny,
Next time a client (or potential client) busts out the ol' "But my competitor has one" line, try asking them if they would release a press release just because their competitor did. Or do a major ad buy because their competitor did.
Actually, scratch that, a few of them might say yes.
Danny Brown
· 11 months ago
Oh, I've had some of these as well... ;-)
It's the message that many seem to miss - just because it's being done doesn't mean it actually needs to be. Similar words but vastly different meanings.
Kari Rippetoe
· 11 months ago
Great post, Danny! It's so important that businesses NOT jump on the blogging bandwagon for the wrong reasons. Doing so ultimately hurts not just the blog, but the business in terms of their brand.
A business owner must also be prepared for the time and effort it takes to maintain the blog - just having one for the sake of having one won't do anyone any good.
Ari Herzog
· 10 months ago
Do you agree that nine times out of ten, if a company asks you, "Do you agree I should have a blog?" that the answer is negative?
Danny Brown
· 10 months ago
I'm not sure if I'd go with such a high number, Ari, but I'd definitely agree that a vast majority of companies aren't "ready" for blogging. And that includes some current ones already live.
Kari Rippetoe
· 10 months ago
That question "Do you agree I should have a blog? reminded me of a former boss of mine, who was the VP of marketing at the company I worked at. He was quick to just jump on the next big thing without really thinking and then proceed to spend (or rather, waste) massive amounts of time on it - without results.
You have those who don't get it, so they avoid it, and you have those who don't get it but dive headlong into it anyway. Which group do you think is worse?
The Lovable Rogue
· 11 months ago
Hey Danny, Again, I fear that this all boils down to the dreaded Social Media Checklist... Organisations are hearing these terms thrown around and are then adopting the instruments regardless of whether their customers are using them. Scary stuff.
Whilst it is fantastic that organisations are keen to get out there and talk with their customers, a targetted approach remains the best course of action. Creating a presence on each and every platform available is likely to leave the company too thinly spread. In such a case, the message is likely to become either diluted, or repetitive. Either outcome will reflect negatively on the organisation.
Focus your efforts and target your message where it is likely to be best heard.
TLR
Danny Brown
· 11 months ago
Of course, the problem there lies with the advice given. To which the question must be - how do companies unaware of the social media *community* navigate around the faux gurus and experts that have suddenly sprung from nowhere?
Tim Jahn
· 11 months ago
You're exactly right. Too many companies are looking to use the latest tools because "everyone else is". This should never be a reason to do anything.
As you say, blogging takes a lot of time and thought. Contrary to popular belief, blogging is not a "cheap" way to boost SEO or business.
Love your blog bud!
Danny Brown
· 11 months ago
It's like press release, Tim - the amount of times I've heard of companies asking for a press release just to boost the links to their site... You know, it still has to be newsworthy and read well.
As you say, it's not always the most popular approach that's the right one.
Adam Gainer
· 11 months ago
Hey Danny,
This post is spot on. Since I've become a community manager / "social media guy" at a new organization I hear requests for a "blog" all the time. It makes me cringe about the misuse of blogs. I think since it's explosion in popularity a lot of misguided individuals see that blogs are instant "publicity".
Keep up the good work.
CathyWebSavvyPR
· 11 months ago
The challenge I run into with some clients is they want to create a blog, and they have good content, and have crafted a well thought out reason for blogging. But they want to stop there.
They fall into that "If I build it...they will come," mentality. They often realize it takes time to build up a blog's following and increase in Google page rank, both of which would grow faster, and lead to more conversions and customers if they engaged in judicious social networking. But some of them perceive that as frivolous, a waste of time.
I am gathering stats of social media success stories, and showing them competitors who are engaging their audience, and reaching out. I'm slowly making headway, but to me, the synergy (to use a good, if overused, word) between a blog, and the right social networking platforms for each client - are a powerful mix. Not everyone should have a fan page on Facebook, not every company should be using LinkedIn, not every client needs to be on twitter, but a little bit of time spent on the right one or combination can go a long way.
Danny Brown
· 11 months ago
That is one of the major problems, Cathy - the "if I have it, it will work" syndrome. There's a lot more work goes on behind the scenes that isn't always obvious.
One of the biggest problems is wrong (or poor) advice being given out. Newly-labeled social media consultants, gurus and experts (usually self-proclaimed) instructing clients to have a presence everywhere, regardless if they're ready for even just one platform or not.
As you say, find what works for you and build upon that - better being tightly focused than thinly spread.
jfouts
· 10 months ago
Really great Post Danny. So many start up a blog because they think they've gotta have it but never have time to give it the love and attention it needs to be successful. Then everybody looks bad and "social media is a waste of time". It's important to evaluate time, skill and need before committing to a blog or any other form of social media.
Eric Heinzman
· 10 months ago
Bill Gates built his business before blogs existed. He did quite well without them - why should he start now?
But what if Bill were just starting out today? Would it be to his advantage to blog about his revolutionary new product, with the goal of building an enthusiastic community of adopters? Or would the model that worked for him in the '70s and '80s be just as effective now?
Danny Brown
· 10 months ago
It's a valid point, although I guess you could also ask if they had been around, would he have used them? Gates and Jobs both did a great job of using the tools of the time to get the word out. With his company offering even more tools to help bloggers in their approach today, perhaps he would have been one of the key leaders?
Eric Heinzman
· 10 months ago
My guess is yes, if the current tools had been around when Gates and Jobs were starting out, they would have taken full advantage of them, and probably done so in unique, transforming, and highly effective ways. I'm sure their methods would have differed - the Gates model would have been to buy up the best blogs and bloggers out there, slap the Microsoft logo on them, and co-opt them to serve his ends, while Jobs would have developed some completely new blogging paradigm that got everybody talking about how innovative he and his company were, while they rushed to copy him.
But let's re-frame the original question: Imagine the 1975 Bill Gates has hired you & asked whether or not he needed a blog (assuming today's blogging tools had been available then). What would you tell him?
Danny Brown
· 10 months ago
Oh, I see what you did there... ;-)
I'd advise the same as I do with each client - are you ready to engage it properly? Do you have the resources to put into it to make it work? Is your audience the type that reads a blog?
Just getting the feel for how serious he'd be and if he is serious, making sure he's not wasting resources that could be better spent elsewhere.
HugeList
· 10 months ago
I agree 100% I just do not have the time to keep up full time with ONE blog, let alone a blog for every website. I am ashamed to say I have many blogs started with the best intentions sitting with just a post or two :(
sab@Webinar company
· 5 months ago
yes i agree with you. but blog is not the way for business. well written.
jim@Marketing Yoga
· 4 months ago
wonderfully written.i really like this.thanks for sharing.
All Comments
Blogs are how we broadcast what is in our minds, our thoughts, our psyche at that particular moment. They are how we get to know our friends, acquaintences, customers. There is no more powerful tool, in my opinion.
Thanks for a great post and the opportunity to share.
This is a great point, and one that many businesses forget when they want to jump on the social media bandwagon. Blogging is just one of the many tools of the trade, but it seems to get more publicity than the rest.
Next time a client (or potential client) busts out the ol' "But my competitor has one" line, try asking them if they would release a press release just because their competitor did. Or do a major ad buy because their competitor did.
Actually, scratch that, a few of them might say yes.
It's the message that many seem to miss - just because it's being done doesn't mean it actually needs to be. Similar words but vastly different meanings.
A business owner must also be prepared for the time and effort it takes to maintain the blog - just having one for the sake of having one won't do anyone any good.
You have those who don't get it, so they avoid it, and you have those who don't get it but dive headlong into it anyway. Which group do you think is worse?
Again, I fear that this all boils down to the dreaded Social Media Checklist... Organisations are hearing these terms thrown around and are then adopting the instruments regardless of whether their customers are using them. Scary stuff.
Whilst it is fantastic that organisations are keen to get out there and talk with their customers, a targetted approach remains the best course of action. Creating a presence on each and every platform available is likely to leave the company too thinly spread. In such a case, the message is likely to become either diluted, or repetitive. Either outcome will reflect negatively on the organisation.
Focus your efforts and target your message where it is likely to be best heard.
TLR
As you say, blogging takes a lot of time and thought. Contrary to popular belief, blogging is not a "cheap" way to boost SEO or business.
Love your blog bud!
As you say, it's not always the most popular approach that's the right one.
This post is spot on. Since I've become a community manager / "social media guy" at a new organization I hear requests for a "blog" all the time. It makes me cringe about the misuse of blogs. I think since it's explosion in popularity a lot of misguided individuals see that blogs are instant "publicity".
Keep up the good work.
They fall into that "If I build it...they will come," mentality. They often realize it takes time to build up a blog's following and increase in Google page rank, both of which would grow faster, and lead to more conversions and customers if they engaged in judicious social networking. But some of them perceive that as frivolous, a waste of time.
I am gathering stats of social media success stories, and showing them competitors who are engaging their audience, and reaching out. I'm slowly making headway, but to me, the synergy (to use a good, if overused, word) between a blog, and the right social networking platforms for each client - are a powerful mix. Not everyone should have a fan page on Facebook, not every company should be using LinkedIn, not every client needs to be on twitter, but a little bit of time spent on the right one or combination can go a long way.
One of the biggest problems is wrong (or poor) advice being given out. Newly-labeled social media consultants, gurus and experts (usually self-proclaimed) instructing clients to have a presence everywhere, regardless if they're ready for even just one platform or not.
As you say, find what works for you and build upon that - better being tightly focused than thinly spread.
But what if Bill were just starting out today? Would it be to his advantage to blog about his revolutionary new product, with the goal of building an enthusiastic community of adopters? Or would the model that worked for him in the '70s and '80s be just as effective now?
But let's re-frame the original question: Imagine the 1975 Bill Gates has hired you & asked whether or not he needed a blog (assuming today's blogging tools had been available then). What would you tell him?
I'd advise the same as I do with each client - are you ready to engage it properly? Do you have the resources to put into it to make it work? Is your audience the type that reads a blog?
Just getting the feel for how serious he'd be and if he is serious, making sure he's not wasting resources that could be better spent elsewhere.
I just do not have the time to keep up full time with ONE blog, let alone a blog for every website. I am ashamed to say I have many blogs started with the best intentions sitting with just a post or two :(