-
Website
http://dannybrown.me/ -
Original page
http://dannybrown.me/2008/12/08/using-social-media-for-change/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Sasha H. Muradali
17 comments · 18 points
-
GlobalPatriot
11 comments · 6 points
-
Ari Herzog
85 comments · 23 points
-
gacconsultants
20 comments · 1 points
-
Danny Brown
594 comments · 32 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Justin Dupre
Deeboo.com Webmaster, SEO, and Internet Marketing Community
<abbr>Max Gladwell´s last blog post..The New Media Landscape: Mass Profesionalization</abbr>
As you say, social change is being utilized by these and legit businesses to the point of diluting the actuality behind the message..
What people are gathering from the messages are:
1. Social change = a smile
2. Social change = a pat on the back
3. Social change = talk of wholesomeness or purity..
When, in fact, social change does not equal 'pollyanna' or perfection, or 100% purity..It simply equals CHANGE. For the good, for the positive, for betterment, not perfection.
Someone will say F'ing blah blah..and automatically, they are viewed as opposite of CHANGE. This is not true in reality. Change only comes from sincere effort, sincere desire, sincerity period. We are not robots and there are people out there doing their darndest to be about something improved.
Businesses are diluting and ultimately creating an impression that says to people, "You are not about social change if you are about what we say you should be about"
That's dangerous, because as we change and improve, we desperately need validation. It's difficult to find those networks.
I could care less if someone talks about sex, talks about drinking, talks about unhealthy things..IF they are making obvious adjustments in their lives..for the good.
That's the only real change there is. It's then referred to as GROWTH.
<abbr>Kimberly Bock´s last blog post..I Was Your Husbands Mistress - World AIDS Day</abbr>
There are many ways change can be implemented as well as measured - whether it's personal, social media-led or otherwise. At the end of the day, as you mention, it's all about the end results - that's where success will be judged.
Thanks for stopping by and sharing your views, Kimberly, appreciated.
If we make it too risky for companies to take action and try to make a difference, they just won't. So you'll have a lot of well-intentioned people at the low and mid-level of a company lobbying for the benefits of a cause marketing program that can make a difference while building brand equity or achieving some other business objective. But the higher-ups might see how their other companies got crushed just for trying and say no. Then nothing happens.
<abbr>Max Gladwell´s last blog post..The New Media Landscape: Mass Profesionalization</abbr>
It could also be down to perception of using social media to spread a message - there are so many conflicting views of how to best use the medium that knowing which is right is difficult. Perhaps we (as in advocates of social media and its uses) need to try and be clearer on our views to make it easier for companies to get involved?
<abbr>JustinSMV´s last blog post..Top 21 Social Media Super Stars Under 30 In 2008</abbr>
I agree with Max because I am seeing the intimidation thats felt by our Big boys whod like to make positive changes.
noone is going to be perfect! Sheesh, I think I have contributed to their being offset by the ideas f change, and I regret that. But I do have an open mind, even MORESO, to companies that have failed us, when I see their willingness to be, as you said, transparent and willing.
Thanks for a gr8 post.
<abbr>Kimberly Bock´s last blog post..Ethics, Transparency, and Talk Is Cheap Around The Web</abbr>